CRYSTAL MOUNTAIN:

THE LEFT AND NEO-CONSERVATIVE WEAPONISATION OF HYPOCRISY!

G. K. Chesterton wrote in his essay Heretics (1905) that “the modern world will accept no dogmas upon authority, but it will accept any dogma on no authority.” In the nihilistic hell built by the pseudo-intellectuals of the French Revolution and Enlightenment, the only standard permitted is the double standard. As pointed out by a multitude of thinkers from the twentieth century, such as Carl Schmitt, Russell Kirk, Karl Löwith, and Eric Voegelin, as well as twenty-first-century pundits such as the author of The New Church Ladies, Jim Goad (RIP), ideology, whether leftism or neoconservatism, operates as a “secular” religion. Nick Land, an eccentric English philosopher, along with Curtis Yarvin, argued that the managerial state of modernity operates as a “Cathedral” that propagates a quasi-religious faith in equality and democracy despite the evidence of history, biology, and economics.

In many ways, leftism, liberalism, neoconservatism, etc. are merely an inverted and Judaised version of Christianity. As stated a multitude of times on this poorly written goy-slop of a blog, the Enlightenment did not abolish faith but simply replaced it with new religions with dogmas, such as human rights, that are applied sacramentally. Confronted by a pervasive sentiment of powerlessness and inferiority and a life seemingly bereft of purpose, the masses, ensnared in a masochistic embrace, have sought refuge in new Puritanical cults. Modernity trampled the Cross and replaced it with an altar to Janus, the ancient Roman god of two faces. Like Janus, it embodies a deeply divided form of hypocrisy: presenting one set of principles while practising another, demanding strict standards from others while excusing itself from those same obligations. This hypocrisy is pretty obvious when it comes to the issue of nationalism.

White nationalism and the Hitlerite regime are condemned as the ultimate evil. Yet neither camp actually opposes ethno-nationalism, border enforcement, or state power as a matter of principle. The Left tolerates the totalitarian ethno-nationalism of the genocidal CCP regime, which pursues an absolute national homogenisation under the Zhonghua Minzu (Han-centric identity) through draconian immigration laws, systemic discrimination, and forced integration. The army of Baizuos (Western liberals) ignores the land grabs and internment of Tibetans, Mongols, Manchus, and Uyghurs while implicating Whites, especially those who support border restrictions, as having the blood of six million Jews and the millions of non-Whites who died from colonisation on their hands. South Africa and Rhodesia are condemned for the Bantustan policy, and Germany for Lebensraum. Even in the West, the left celebrates the plague of violence that Whites are coerced to endure everyday!

Conquering the Worm:

At the same time, leftists like Fiona Edwards of the “No Cold War” group stated that “No ‘genocide’ of the Uyghurs is taking place in China.” The group hosted events featuring individuals who denied or minimised the camps, while Labour MP Diane Abbott appeared at one such event (and later apologised). Rapper and activist Lowkey has said he “doesn’t consider what’s happening to the Uyghurs as genocide.” The Morning Star, a longstanding British left newspaper, described evidence of persecution as “laughably weak”. This is akin to downplaying the persecution of the Biafrans (Igbos) in Nigeria because they are Christians and because the Trump administration highlighted their plight. Likewise, the spiteful mutants, i.e., the typical leftoid, celebrate the subjection of Whites in South Africa and Zimbabwe to brutal land redistribution and systemic violence, much like the millions of Palestinians whom Israel is ethnically cleansing. As with the ethnic cleansing of the French in Haiti, the excuse is that Whites deserve mistreatment for past colonisation. The song “Holiday in Cambodia” by the Dead Kennedys best describes the Left. Its satire of ideological conformity, hypocrisy, and subservience to political power captures the contradictions of the star-belly sneetches that is the modern Left.

Meanwhile, Neocons champion Israel’s right to demographic “self-preservation” while denying that exact same right to Western nations. For decades, the neoconservative position reveals a profound hypocrisy regarding national sovereignty: it views ethno-demographic preservation as an existential right for foreign allies but an existential sin for the West. While the neoconservative establishment banishes Pat Buchanan for his immigration positions (along with Peter Brimelow) and for daring to offer a nuanced account of World War II, it champions Israel’s border walls, bloodline citizenship laws, ethnic-cleansing, expansionism, and explicit policy of maintaining a national majority as vital to its survival.

Yet it labels identical arguments for Western border enforcement as “backward nativism” and the crime of questioning certain orthodoxy, whether it is the Wilsonian narrative of WWII or American support for Israel as a genocidal hatred for the Jews! The second, a European or White American, asks for modest border control or questions foreign aid; both establishment factions join hands to brand them “racist” or even right-wing basement-dwelling chuds pushing their brand of “wokeness”. White evangelical neocons will prop up figures like Ben Shapiro, who wants your son to die for his country but is apathetic to America’s demographic change, and Vivek Ramaswamy, who lectures Americans that they are too lazy and should be replaced by his people. Moral posturing and pathologisation are simply the mechanisms used to maintain elite power. Instead of leading to doom, hypocrisy, and perversion, it fortified the Leviathan of modernity because it conceals the real problems and keeps people believing in the system even when it no longer makes sense. However, this instrumental hypocrisy goes beyond looking the other way, with atrocities being exploited for political gain. It extends to the active, deliberate engineering of moral outrage as a tool of regime maintenance and foreign policy leverage.

Conquering the Worm:

Human suffering is not an object of genuine ethical concern; it is a transactional asset. When atrocities align with elite interests, they are amplified through a sympathetic media echo chamber to manufacture public consent for interventions, sanctions, or domestic security expansion. This is exemplified by the Left’s tactic of turning a concrete humanitarian catastrophe into a rhetorical weapon aimed at domestic political targets, rather than treating it as a tragedy in its own right. The best example of this is how the Left exploits the genocide of the Palestinians to advance third-worldist theory and to lambast White people and Western civilisation, rather than out of genuine concern for the mass slaughter perpetrated by the Jewish state of Israel, thus rendering the genocide of more than six million Palestinians into a rhetorical weapon aimed at domestic targets.

The pattern continued when the Left mourned the end of the CIA’s USAID, a taxpayer-funded programme responsible for the embezzlement of billions through nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) to arm militants all over the world, including jihadist terrorists. Obviously, the Left are apathetic to the fact that their purported adversaries, Israel and the CIA, are utilising USAID to fund groups such as Hamas or perpetuate imperialism. They are concerned only that ending it could potentially dry up funds for humanitarian crises that can be exploited to erase the borders of White countries. Likewise, neocons exploit the oppression of Hong Kong, Tibet, and Ughystan by the CCP, as well as the war in Ukraine, as a cynical ploy to bring about the apocalypse. Turning human rights violations into a chiliastic crusade, thus framing, makes diplomatic compromise, de-escalation, or sphere-of-influence realism politically impossible, ensuring permanent escalation.

• Your unwavering support and continued engagement are truly invaluable, breathing life into each word crafted and sustaining this platform’s mission. If you found resonance or insight within this piece, I kindly invite you to express your appreciation by tapping the heart icon and sharing it with those who may also benefit. These small but significant gestures not only amplify our collective voice but also help the algorithm recognise and extend our message to a broader audience. Your involvement makes all the difference—God bless and thank you for being an integral part of this journey.