LIVING MONSTROSITY:

TERROR THREAT RISES AS IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS ARE UNDERMINED

FREMONT, Calif.— As our decaying nation remains absorbed in the sensationalised arrest of Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian green card holder who was recently deported due to his vocal endorsement of Hamas’ noble endeavours to shield women and children from the brutality of Zionist occupiers—brutality that includes acts of rape, sexual enslavement, and murder—a far more insidious and imminent peril lurks, largely unrecognised. While it is impossible to disregard the human suffering that Khalil claims to champion, particularly in his condemnation of the brutal genocide worse than the Holocaust (which allegedly exterminated six million Jews as well as a few other parasites like sodomites and Gipsies) afflicting Palestinians, one must not lose sight of the immutable constitutional reality: non-citizens, regardless of their legal status or if they support the illegitimate state of Israel or the valiant Palestinian freedom-fighters like Hamas (albeit it is obvious that their October 7th offensive should have been a thousand times more aggressive), are NOT endowed with the same constitutional protections as American citizens. This inconvenient truth aside, the public’s fixation on the legal proceedings against Khalil conveniently diverts attention from the far graver and more covert threat—one that looms ominously over the nation’s borders, unseen by the very eyes entrusted with safeguarding national security. Contrary to the disingenuous narratives peddled by the woke right, i.e., the neoconservatives—the existential threat to American sovereignty does not emanate from Russia or Hamas, but rather from the demographic transformation of the United States and other White nations, a reality they conspicuously refuse to acknowledge or confront. In other words, unless they oppose the ravishment of Palestinian children like Khalil, they are not “giving a good damn about the so-called “browning of America”, to paraphrase Neo-con and professional oven-dodging foreigner Ben Shapiro.

In 2022, the infestation of Afghans in the United States had reached approximately 195,000, a sharp increase from around 54,000 in 2010. This growth can be largely attributed to the U.S. military’s humiliating withdrawal from Afghanistan, followed by the ensuing instability that plagued the region. The rapid resurgence of the Taliban, coupled with the breakdown of governance and security, prompted a mass exodus of over 200,000 Afghans exploiting the quagmire to invade the United States and other White countries. The vast majority of Afghan evacuees entered the United States under parole rather than through the more stringent Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) or refugee programmes. It was estimated that 68,654 Afghans were granted SIVs, 17,000 SIVs of which were bestowed on applicants with purported ties as American allies—an overwhelming 72,550 evacuees were simply paroled into the country. Thanks to the U.S. State Department’s Coordinator for Afghan Relocation Efforts (CARE) and the United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP), they arrived without permanent status or the rigorous vetting required for formal immigration pathways. This surge of Afghan intruders highlights the catastrophic consequences of failed foreign policy and lax border enforcement, forging the ideal conditions for the proliferation of extremist elements such as Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi, an ISIS terrorist from Afghanistan whose suicide bomb plot was foiled. Some alarming data from the U.S. Border Patrol reveals that 103 suspected terrorists were encountered between ports of entry along the Southwest border in fiscal year 2024. Although this marks a decrease from the record high of 169 encounters in the previous year—considered an extraordinary spike in watchlist apprehensions—these numbers remain alarmingly high under the Biden administration.

President Trump’s recent revocation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for 532,000 savages from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, coupled with his invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, represents a decisive manoeuvre to fortify national security against potential terrorist threats. This act, part of the Alien and Sedition Acts, grants the president authority during wartime or when the U.S. is threatened by invasion or predatory incursion. In this instance, the administration has targeted members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua (TdA) and, hopefully, the thousands of Afghans that trespassed into our nation, citing their involvement in criminal activities that pose a threat to public safety. The proclamation directs the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security to apprehend, restrain, secure, and remove individuals identified as members of TdA. Nevertheless, formidable operational impediments persist, chiefly emanating from an entrenched judiciary that subverts executive authority under the guise of legal oversight. In a brazen act of judicial overreach, the possibly Jewish and Obama-appointed Judge James Boasberg, whose wife is a major Democratic Party donor, has unilaterally waged a legal insurrection against the enforcement of President Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act, effectively paralysing deportations that are critical to safeguarding national security. This flagrant judicial usurpation exemplifies the metastasising inclination of the judiciary toward ideological subversion, wherein activist jurists imperiously seize the authority to eviscerate duly enacted safeguards intended to fortify the republic against pernicious external adversaries. By circumventing executive prerogatives and obstructing the enforcement of measures critical to national security, such rogue magistrates transform the judiciary into an instrument of subversion, eroding the foundational principles of sovereign governance of the White Anglo-Saxon Christian homeland.

Compounding this multifaceted crisis are the plethora of unconstitutional challenges surrounding the detention of alien narcotics traffickers and terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Legal and political pressures have mounted against the facility’s continued use, with critics leveraging human rights rhetoric to undermine its operational efficacy. This has fostered a precarious situation, where the capacity to detain individuals who pose grave threats to national security has been so severely compromised that it risks culminating in an almost complete shutdown of the Guantanamo facility. Military officials are currently evaluating plans to drastically reduce the number of U.S. troops stationed at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba, potentially slashing troop levels by as much as fifty per cent. This reduction in personnel comes amid increasing concerns over the logistical and security challenges posed by the detention of intruders and other high-risk individuals at the facility, causing the transfer of these dangerous detainees back to the American homeland, thereby exposing the nation to heightened risks. In the wake of the closure of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, the United States has been compelled to explore alternative detention solutions to manage its increasing immigration and national security concerns. One notable response has been the reopening of detention facilities such as the one in Baldwin, Michigan. This move comes as part of a broader strategy by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to bolster its capacity for detaining the filth-infested vermin swarm who pose a threat to national security or are involved in trespassing into the United States. To facilitate this expansion, ICE has entered into a contractual agreement with GEO Group, a private prison management company, to operate the Baldwin facility. This partnership marks a significant shift in policy as the government seeks to address the growing demand for detention space amidst a backdrop of escalating border security challenges such as the $2 billion shortfall in ICE funding.