ONWARDS:

AN AMERICA-FIRST BLUEPRINT FOR REPATRIATION!

Well, an unfortunate event recently occurred. The Supreme Court struck down the President’s tariffs. Tariffs, although inconsistent, had generated a tremendous $87 billion for the country, despite the government shutdown causing an economic quagmire. As if that were not bad enough, Lutnick was actively sabotaging them to profit his own company, the kind of behaviour that would get someone expelled from a multitude of countries multiple times. But speaking of expulsion, since Lutnick’s people have been expelled from over 1000 countries for their nefarious behaviour, there are more pressing matters. One is the ongoing influx of immigrants into the United States. Nearly all recent population increases in the United States are driven by immigration, legal and illegal alike, at levels that cannot be sustained indefinitely. There are 52 million immigrants residing in the United States in 2023. Immigration watchdogs at the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) estimate that there are roughly 18.5 million illegal immigrants in the country, though the true number is likely significantly higher. Legal immigrants comprise more than half of the foreign-born population.

If the president wants to preserve his legacy, he will address this invasion with extra steps at the State of the Union. Approximately a deluge of roughly 1 to 1.2 million people has been legally entering the United States each year since 1990. Most of these new arrivals are non-White (including 400,000 Jewish aliens), a major contributor to not only the replacement of America’s historic White majority but also the decay of this once great nation. About half of all U.S. immigrants (52%, or 26.7 million people) come from Latin America, especially Mexico. The Caribbean accounts for roughly 5 to 5.3 million immigrants, about 10% of the total. This aligns with the broader Latin America and Caribbean share, where Caribbean-origin immigrants constitute roughly one in ten of these parasites, led by uncivilised backwaters such as Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, and the real-life Wakanda, Haiti, known for its famous fine-dining cuisines, such as mud cookies, kitty barbecue, and human flesh. Since spicy dog food is worth making the streets more dangerous, America gets invaded by 15.3 million (30%) from Sub-Saharan Africa, India, the Philippines, and the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). If these numbers are to change, it will require a fundamental shift in immigration policy rather than continuing existing immigration priorities and visa programmes. If not, America risks becoming “a heterogeneous compound; to change and corrupt the national spirit; to complicate and confound public opinion; to introduce foreign propensities”, as Founding Father Alexander Hamilton warned.

My Own Native Land: Putting America First

While the administration of Pres. Trump has been largely pusillanimous in tackling both illegal and legal immigration. There have been some positive developments, such as the process to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and humanitarian parole programs. Another positive is that there was a 16% drop in immigration cases and visa applicants since 2024, due in part to slightly longer processing times. The 2025 invasion saw a sharp decline in arrivals, with between 10,000 and 295,000 more people leaving the United States than entering during the fiscal year. Work authorisation requests were cut in half by October, while overall approvals dropped more than a fifth. U.S. consulates issued far fewer visas than the previous year, with immigrant visas down 20% and nonimmigrant visas down 16%. The White Papers Policy Institute published an essay that found that family-based categories such as immediate-relative visas (FX1, FX2, and FX3) alone fell by 6,128. Student enrolments from abroad shrank by 17,457, and international visitors to the US fell by over 828,000 in the first eleven months. Green card issuances abroad fell substantially, dropping to between 560,000 and 575,000, a decline of more than 100,000 compared with 2024. Much of this can be attributed to stronger law enforcement, which helps deter criminal activities such as fraud. This reversal contrasts sharply with trends since the 1990s, when annual inflows of legal and illegal immigrants numbered in the millions. In fact, the United States has finally experienced a net loss in international migration for the first time in fifty years. While these are good starts, they are insufficient to reclaim Albion’s Seed.

Reform should not only address illegal immigration through broader and tougher enforcement, but also include repatriation policies for legal immigrants and their descendants, meaning the return of people to their country of origin. According to a Harris Poll, large shares of Americans have considered leaving the country, including 61% of Hispanics, 57% of negroids, 52 % of Democrats, and 61% of sodomites. Survey data in the United States suggests a notable level of interest in emigration among minority populations. A 2024 study conducted by Monmouth University reported that half of respondents identified as “people of colour” said they would consider relocating abroad if given the opportunity, while separate polling indicated that roughly 26% of Asian Americans expressed interest in leaving the country. Additionally, a Pew Research Center survey from 2016 found that second- and third-generation Hispanics in the United States were increasingly less likely to believe they were doing better than their parents, reflecting a weaker sense of identification with the country and continued ties to their ancestral homelands. If President Donald Trump (also known as John Barron) were serious about immigration, he would urge Congress at the State of the Union to adopt repatriation of legal immigrants across generations as the necessary, orderly, and safe deportation of non-Western peoples back to their countries of ancestral origin or a third country willing to take them.

Repatriate or get Replaced

The policies needed to save America are not a radical manifesto like the Turner Diaries or Siege but rather grounded in the principles of ‘We the People’ and the Völkisch foundations of America, as made evident by the Naturalization Acts of 1790-1798, which codified a racial caste in the country and rightfully restricted immigration only to “free white persons of good character”. Likewise, Harding and Calvin Coolidge signed the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and the Johnson-Reed Act of 1924, which established quotas that echoed the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. Similar to America’s past immigration system and Singapore’s, this blueprint requires strict regional caps on immigrant concentrations, a fifty-year moratorium on all immigration, mandatory dispersal of new arrivals, and high-security migrant dorms with worker restrictions. Additionally, such legislation mandate a college-level proficiency in English (similar to the language requirement of Japan) and a universal E-Verify system nationwide, coupled with more stringent biometric IDs that would be required to vote, a proposal that ought to be in the SAVE Act. Additionally, this biometric ID would incorporate an AI-managed database of legal immigrants flagged for low economic output, high remittance transfers, or dense foreign social networks. The AI system would also end chain migration by reviewing pending family petitions retroactively, resulting in mass denials for chains involving lower-income sponsors, which are common in extended family cases. Combined with inter-agency data sharing, this would flag sponsors and put pressure on them to voluntarily withdraw petitions or prompt the self-deportation of relatives already in limbo.

But the most important duty of this AI system is to set quotas in entry, employment, education, housing, and government contracts, limiting the number of foreign-born individuals across first, second, and third generations, as well as outright banning chain migration and entry from the Global South. These quotas would also impose a 70% tax on remittances and further bar not only illegal immigrants but foreign-born individuals(from the Global South) and their descendants, up to the fourth generation, from receiving federal or state benefits, including in-state tuition, tax credits, public housing, and healthcare. Rather than funding welfare programs or remittances, any resources sent abroad should be used to support repatriation programs, including the return of long-settled immigrant populations with ancestral or national ties, and to fund expedited deportations without full hearings for individuals whose status has been revoked or suspended, even if they were previously lawful residents. Furthermore, it is proposed to revoke the citizenship of any amnesty recipient, including those with DACA protections and birthright citizenship, as well as anyone who commits a crime or is remotely related to any individual who has committed a crime within the United States. These types of expulsions have been successful in the past, with examples such as the criminal roundup in El Salvador or the mass deportations seen in Operation Wetback and similar operations in Bhutan. In conclusion, these proposals are not only rooted in early American history and its founding Anglo-Saxon heritage, but are also highly feasible

Your unwavering support and continued engagement are truly invaluable, breathing life into each word crafted and sustaining this platform’s mission. If you found resonance or insight within this piece, I kindly invite you to express your appreciation by tapping the heart icon and sharing it with those who may also benefit. These small but significant gestures not only amplify our collective voice but also help the algorithm recognise and extend our message to a broader audience. Your involvement makes all the difference—God bless and thank you for being an integral part of this journey.