GUN CONTROL:

UNCOVERING THE CONCEALED TRUTH ABOUT THE ATTACK ON THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS

WACO, Texas—Ratified on December 15th, 1791, the Second Amendment, a cornerstone of the Bill of Rights, enshrines the inalienable and indomitable right of the citizenry to possess and bear arms. It accentuates the paramount importance of a well-regulated militia (posse comitatus)—an indispensable institution for safeguarding the sanctity of liberty and the stability of a free republic. With unwavering clarity, it proclaims that this fundamental right, intricately interwoven with the very fabric of American sovereignty, shall remain impervious to any encroachment or usurpation by external or governmental forces. Contrary to efforts by global Jewry, this provision, deeply entrenched in the doctrines of self-determination and individual autonomy, stands as an unyielding bulwark against tyranny and an eloquent affirmation of the resolute spirit of the American people to defend their liberties, both in their singular capacities and in collective solidarity. George Mason stated, “The militia is the whole people.” The Founding Fathers, with sagacious foresight, recognized that an armed populace, organized into a militia, constituted a vital safeguard against the rise of despotism. The right to bear arms, enshrined in the Constitution, was never intended as a mere privilege but as a fundamental safeguard against tyranny. As articulated in Federalist No. 46 by James Madison—the very architect of the Constitution—this right was deliberately established to ensure that the citizenry, when organized as a militia, would possess the means to resist subjugation, whether by oppressive domestic rulers or foreign adversaries. Thomas Jefferson, in his immortal words from the Declaration of Independence, proclaimed, “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.” This statement embodies the foundational ethos of self-governance and the inalienable prerogative of a free people to cast off tyranny. When a regime ceases to uphold these sacred principles and instead devolves into oppression, the governed are neither morally nor legally bound to submit; rather, they possess the sovereign duty to dismantle and reconstitute their government in accordance with justice and the consent of the governed. Or in other words “Sic Semper Tyrannis!”

This doctrine of resistance, deeply embedded in our nation’s Christian heritage, serves as a perpetual reminder that the legitimacy of any state is contingent upon its adherence to the fundamental rights of man and the liberties of its people. In Acts 5:29, Peter and the apostles boldly declared to the same tyrannical Jewish authorities that martyred our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, “We ought to obey God rather than men”, affirming that divine authority supersedes human decrees. This echoes Romans 13:1, which calls for submission to government—but not blind obedience when it contradicts God’s law. This ethos is encapsulated in the motto of Benjamin Franklin’s proposed seal, declaring, “Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God!”—a timeless affirmation that the right to resist oppression is not merely a political prerogative but a sacred duty. This sentiment galvanized many early Americans, particularly among those who had suffered under the British oppressive rule. The idea that tyranny loses its legitimacy when it infringes upon fundamental rights is a cornerstone of the American ethos, asserting the need for active resistance as a form of upholding God’s ordained truth. The historical context of Franklin’s assertion is critical. The American colonies were increasingly aware of their rights, and as grievances against British rule mounted, so did the call for rebellion. Franklin’s words remind citizens, such as the brave men who sacrificed their lives against Lincoln’s totalitarianism, that loyalty to a government does not necessitate blind obedience, especially when such governance errs against the very principles enshrined in a just society

It is within this very holy tradition of resistance to government overreach that Representative Lauren Boebert of Colorado has positioned her legislative efforts. In a bold and unequivocal move, she ushered in 2023 with a proposal to dismantle the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), the federal agency responsible for arming the cartel, the murder of Duncan Lemp, as well as numerous false imprisonments—most notably the erroneous incarceration of Master-at-Arms 1st Class Patrick Tate Adamiak. Additionally, under the dyke kike Janet Reno, the ATF perptrauted numerous massacres such as Ruby Ridge (on the behest of the Zionists who brutally and illegally occupy America just as in the lands of Arab Christians), Waco, and most tragically Oklahoma City. These incidents, emblematic of government overreach and prosecutorial overzealousness, serve as stark reminders of the dangers posed when federal agencies exceed their constitutional mandates and infringe upon the liberties of the very citizens they purport to serve. This bill seeks to curb the multitude of egregious infringements upon the sacrosanct rights of American citizens. Boebert’s challenge to the ATF is not merely a critique of bureaucratic inefficiency but an indictment of a system that has repeatedly trampled upon the right of due process and the Second Amendment, which to an extent infringes on the First Amendment principles relating to free speech and free association. By advocating for its dissolution, she reignites the enduring debate over the limits of federal power, the sanctity of individual rights, and the necessity of perpetual vigilance against tyranny. This broader fight against federal overreach is further underscored by the recent dismissal of Pamela Hicks—who, for nearly 28 years, played a role in undermining Americans’ God-given right to self-defence, including 23 years as a DOJ attorney and her tenure as ATF Chief Counsel. Her removal and replacement by FBI director Kash Patel by Attorney General Pam Bondi marks a decisive step in the Trump administration’s ongoing mission to “drain the swamp”.

However, to truly drain the swamp, one must first acknowledge who the swamp monsters are. The same plutocracy disarming Americans is so powerful, the Attorney General is too frightened to release files from Epstein’s Mossad blackmail operation despite her promise. These are not merely faceless bureaucrats or inefficient government employees; they are a cabal of entrenched foreign oligarchs who have quietly disarmed the people and conquered the land for which our White Anglo-Saxon Protestant(WASPs) forefathers bled, doing so without firing a single shot. Through economic manipulation, lobbying, and covert influence, they’ve embedded themselves within American institutions, subtly shaping policies to serve their own globalist agendas and control the populace through a push for gun control. Under the guise of public safety, a plethora of Jewish organizations, politicians, and celebrities unite in their commitment to seek to undermine the Second Amendment, stripping citizens of their fundamental right to self-defence and disarming the populace. Organizations such as the Jewish Gun Violence Prevention Roundtable (JGVP), the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism (RAC), the Jewish Council for Public Affairs (JCPA), the Union for Reform Judaism (URJ), the Anti-Defimation League (ADL), and a multitude of other groups amplify the collective voices of the Jewish community by urging Congress to enact policies like mandatory background checks and a ban on assault weapons. These measures, while framed as safety precautions, aim to disarm the American public and ensure they remain powerless against rising tyranny. By sabotaging the Second Amendment, they pave the way for greater government control and erode the people’s ability to resist authoritarian overreach.

Exploiting a tragedy is the best way to serve as one of their primary tools to disarm and disempower the citizenry, weakening the very checks and balances that were designed to protect freedom and prevent the rise of authoritarian rule. In the wake of the slaughter of 26 elementary school children and school staff in Newtown, Conn. — plus the killer’s mother —the Jewish community is strongly supportive of gun control. This includes Jew Michael Bloomberg, the former New York City Mayor, who blamed the NRA for the massacre and doubled down on his push for stricter gun control (apparently New York likes their mayors to be descendents of Christ killers who seek to disarm the Christian populace like Ed Koch). Rebranding his organization as Everytown for Gun Safety, he intensified efforts to pressure lawmakers into stripping American citizens of their right to self-defence, using the tragedy as a catalyst to erode the Second Amendment while receiving funding from professional oven-dodger and fellow Jew George Soros and help the Jewess Jackey Rosen occupy my home state of Nevada. A decade after Sandy Hook, the gun-grabbing Jewish Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut joined families and survivors to once again exploit the tragedy, using the memory of the dead to shame Americans into surrendering their firearms. Cloaked in the rhetoric of public safety, his efforts serve to erode the Second Amendment and further disarm the populace in the face of growing government overreach. These laws ranged from imposing tighter regulations on the sale and purchase of firearms and ammunition to mandating so-called “safety locks,” all under the guise of public safety while further encroaching upon Americans’ constitutional right to self-defense. Jewish organizations have exploited tragedies to justify goyim gun grabs, dating back to the aftermath of the assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr. and President Kennedy. Jewish figures such as Senator Howard Metzenbaum and Emanuel Celler were instrumental in paving the way for expansive firearm restrictions utilizing the assassinations that occurred in the 1960s, notably through the Gun Control Act of 1968, which laid the groundwork for subsequent legislation like the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. This later bill, sponsored by Jews like Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer—who had also backed Metzenbaum’s other anti-gun initiatives, such as the Brady Bill and the 1994 Gun Violence Prevention Act—further cemented the criminalization of gun ownership. The legislation treated law-abiding citizens as akin to members of organized crime syndicates, such as cartels and the Mafia, thereby tarnishing the fundamental right to bear arms and eroding personal freedoms.

In the aftermath of the Columbine massacre, four staunchly anti-Second Amendment Senators—Frank Lautenberg, Barbara Boxer, Herbert Kohl, and Dianne Feinstein—seized the tragedy as a pretext to advance a slate of restrictive firearm measures. Of course, all these Senators, like the anti-gun judge Abner Mikva who mentored Barack Obama, were as Jewish as an ashtray in Auschwitz. Ben Cohen, who founded Ben and Jerry’s ice cream company, is one of many of the several other companies with top Jewish executives who oppose gun rights. Numerous high-profile Jewish celebrities have been vocal advocates for stringent gun control measures, leveraging their influence to sway public opinion. Figures such as Barbra Streisand, Dee Snider, Mel Brooks, Billy Crystal, Amy Schumer (cousin of Senator Chuck Schumer), and Sarah Silverman have all championed restrictions on firearm ownership. Notably, Jewess Natalie Portman was in the film ‘Vox Lux, a movie about mass shootings, the Parkland High shooting occurred. In response, Portman called mass shootings the “Vietnam of our generation” and marched with gay Jew David Hogg demanding a ban on private firearm ownership. The stance of the Jewish community on gun control is a multifaceted issue rooted in cultural and ideological factors. As noted by Rabbi Eric Yoffie, the former head Rabbi of Reform Judaism, many Jews are deeply embedded in urban liberalism. This stance is underpinned by a commitment to social justice narratives and an inherent skepticism toward the NRA and armed citizenry, particularly those hailing from America’s traditional heartland—predominantly rural, White, Christian, and conservative. To many within the Jewish intelligentsia and political class, such demographics represent an antithesis to the secular cosmopolitan ethos they champion. The specter of an armed populace, unmoored from progressive orthodoxy, is perceived not as a bulwark of liberty but as a latent threat to the carefully curated dystopian order they seek to sustain. This is not just an American phenomenon, the predominantly Jewish Bolshevik authorities disarmed the White Christian peoples of Russia and Eastern Europe.